Outsourcing - a little Jekyll and Hyde?
"The supplier will be proactive, innovative and flexible and will make continuous improvements to the services . . ."
"Price reduction mechanisms, best market pricing and benchmarking will be
required . . . "
"We are not bound to accept the lowest cost bid or indeed any bid . . . the contract will be awarded to the most economically advantageous bid."
These and similar phrases are often to be found in Outsourcing RFPs (IS especially), and frequently all present in the same document. At best there is contradiction here, and at worst this 'something for nothing' dance can hobble the deal from the start.
What do YOU think? Do you agree or disagree? For instance:
- Would you accept it as a fair pastiche of RFPs you have seen?
- What does the first one even mean in concrete terms?
- Are there conflicts between these requirements?
I'm kicking off the final module of my Diploma with this action research question. I don't know what I'll find, so don't hold back in your views, whether you are for or against whatever you suspect my position is!
So please leave your comments, and with luck the comments will spark thoughts in others.
Thanks, Graham

